FACEBOOK PAGE FOR RECENT UPDATES

http://www.facebook.com/UgcNetCandidates2012
FACEBOOK PAGE FOR RECENT UPDATES 

It is a Chance Don't Miss It

NEWS LETTER

It is a Chance Don’t Miss It

Sir

 I am Hari Krishnan from Kerala forwarding here with following findings

1)      from the criteria settled by UGC for Dec 2011 is being increased by 5 % for the Third paper ,before notifying the Examination for June 2012. They are again changing  the criteria to 65 % 60% 55% for Gen/OBC/SC&ST with out any reasonable ground

And its is not just 15% increase.

e.g. in General Category, it is:
First paper: from 40 to 65= 25 %
Second paper: from 40 to 65= 25 %
Third paper: from 50 to 65= 15%

Total increase in three subjects= 65%

Here by making a new criteria of 65% UGC has actually made a new criteria of 65% in all papers. Because here a candidate need to secure 65 % in all his third papers so there is no  basis for 40 % 40% 50% / 35,35,45 /35 35,40

2)      By setting an aggregate of 65/55/50 in all papers UGC is giving priority to all three papers. Here NET – Lectureship is conducted for selecting  an expert teacher in his discipline but through this aggregate process those candidate who is having less mark in his selected topic can secure high  mark in paper 1  and can qualify NET   and be posted as Lecturer in selected subject

3)      Here at the time of publishing final answer key UGC has avoided many questions but they setted aggregate for all subjects with out making necessary change of such avoided questions in total marks

4)      UGC is a qualifying exam and not competitive exam so it is not fair to reduce the candidate on the basis of increase in  number. For a qualifying exam there need a qualification criteria. In the absence of such criteria a student cannot approach the exam with confidence. Here UGC says that they can change criteria as per his likes at any time it will affte not only the present victims but also future candidates too  so it is also a serious problem .

5)      By practicing such a system UGC is reducing them selves as an Exam  of Fortune. They are classifying students not as Looser and gainers but as Fortunate  and Unfortunates

6)      Here  I am agreeing that UGC can fix high standard and criteria for selecting the best suitable candidates But all these things must be done before starting  exam procedure .Here UGC is not showing any responsibility to students and to country. UGC is collecting huge amount as application money but they are not showing any responsibility at least to the amount of money  so collected . In this year UGC collected nearly 20 crore as application money

7)      Here UGC shown a mere business trick , They attracted  all the PG Holders to apply for exam. Because of No Negative marking . No Age limit and Objective mode in Third Paper  most of the PG Holders tried their attempt. After publishing the result UGC is saying that Criteria is changed ,it is not just

8)      UGC may says that No of increase in NET holders forced them to increase the criteria but when we compares the result with the previous years number of applicants  we can see that it is not such a wide increasing  rate it is only marginal. Most of new NET holders are having already NET they tried for JRF in this time due to the liberalization of procedure

9)                UGC is not making such mistakes for the first time , in the previous years also they had committed  such mistakes

E.g. .  for the examination 2008 June 29 UGC published 2 results at two times .One is published as main list and another  one as supplementary mark list . Supplementary is published due to the interference of Court. The Supplementary list included the list of 430 members

During the year 2009 also UGC issued supplementary list of 104 members

A candidate from home science register No (320234) was absent in the first list announced by UGC But approaching court her register no was included in the second supplementary List

So I am saying to all the candidates that we need to make “ Do Or Die” approach for getting a reasonable justice from UGC . All the students should use their political and cultural contacts for influencing the MP/ Central Ministers and requesting them to present the matters with UGC Chairman / Kapil Sibal  / PM /  President etc . In addition to that You should personally send a copy of petition with UGC Chairman and Kapil Sibal. Should fight through  Court and should attain Maximum Media attention . Here we are organizing Secretariat march on Saturday . We have created a Blog on Face book

 It is a site for filing NET Affidavit

http://sdrv.ms/Qyd4Gd

Hari

acquasolutionkerala@gmail.com

09947421065

Grounds for Filing Writ in the Court

*Grounds for filling Writ in the Court*

1.      UGC is following Qualifying Criteria for P1 +P2 = 50% & P3 =45%

from December 2006 exam to December 2011 exam. Why this time it increased

Qualifying Criteria to overall 65%?

2.      NET exam is not like other Entrance exams, where only limited

seats are available & therefore it is necessary required to declare the

cut-offs marks as per available seats. NET is just a Qualifying Exam and

not an Entrance Test.

3.      Further the one subject is not similar to other subject . Why

should students of one subject suffer as papers of some other subject were

easy and large no. of student from it qualified.

4.      If the UGC is declaring Cut-offs to 65%. Then why the UGC

allowing students who got 55% in Master degree for the NET Exam.

5.      UGC has power to decide the cut of marks. However it cannot be

arbitrary. There must be some logic behind it.  Normally first class i.e.

60% is held qualified for to be a faculty member even by AICTE.

6.      If UGC reduce the cut-offs (say to 60% or 55%), Certainly it

will increase the number of qualified candidates in the list, but It will

not dilute the standard of the purpose of UGC-net exam. All who have

cleared are not going for jobs of teaching.

7.      UGC result is not based on any reasonable ground. The action of

UGC is arbitrary. More than six thousand candidates of Management subject

qualified UGC NET examination held in June, 2012.

 8.      UGC declared on its official website that the final criteria for

 qualifying UGC NET would be declared before the declaration of the final

 result but UGC declared the qualifying criteria after declaring the final

 result.

 9.      UGC set very high percentage for qualifying UGC NET just because

 to reduce the number of the NET qualified candidates and it has no other

 reasonable ground.

10.  UGC uploaded answer keys of UGC NET in which many keys are crossed

by UGC. The marks of crossed answers should be given to all the

candidates commonly but it is also not done and no marks are given to the

candidates commonly.

Sir,

            Subject: University Grants Commission’s National Eligibility Test (NET)

            Reference: NET of June 24 – Examination – 2012

            Be kind enough to see the grievances of students those who attended the referred examination. In the pre-examination notification, the UGC has illustrated the level of marks criteria. But after examination the commission has changed marks criteria with their discretionary and callous minded authority. Hence the UGC has seriously injured the minds of a number of students. In this examination they introduced objective type questions and implemented in the science subjects. A number of studious students have been attracted to objective type of examination in Humanities. But the Commission has destroyed the healthy trends of higher education with their draconian decision.

            In the last year there were three steps in the examination. Paper I consisted of 100 marks, 50 questions to be attended out of 60 questions. Paper II-100 marks, 50 questions to be attended. Paper III was descriptive type, total marks 200. But the examination of June-2012 became objective type of 75 questions, total marks 150.

           

                                    Qualifying Criteria Up to December-2011

             

Category	Paper I	Paper II	Paper III
General	40%	40%	50%
OBC	35%	35%	45%
SC/ST/PH/VH	35%	35%	40%

              Latest Criteria of UGC

Category	Paper I	Paper II	Paper III	Aggregate (*)
General	40%	40%	50%	65%
OBC	35%	35%	45%	60%
SC/ST/PH/VH	35%	35%	40%	55%

* New criteria of the University Grants Commission after examination with a veto    power

From the early days itself there was a statement in their notification “Pass criteria may be changed”. So it was a formal statement of the Commission and was not harmful to the students. The notable points are the following:

v  The provisional publication of answer key by the commission may help a student to see the pass or failure. But it is a license to UGC to do injustice in the name of criteria. It is for keeping nepotism, corruption and favoritism.

v  Hence a responsible body of education has violated the total spirit and cheated the students.

v  In the notification of NET itself they can say the level of marks. But in the greenroom they are playing with black cards.

v  A student is aware of mode of writing to attain pass criteria with blackening process. This false play of UGC may continue in the next time also.

v  Examination is not a way to amass currency. But it must be for academic wellness.

v  The publication of answer key by the UGC carries a dubious look because it is published two times. This is very irrational and unjustifiable.

v  Now the NET holders of previous terms have applied for JRF. So the number of candidates was in high level. It led to a loss of opportunity to the candidates of 2012 June 24 examination.

The UGC can raise the level of marks of JRF. It does not mean the total firing on Lectureship also. It is against justice and aggrieved students are going to seek the intervention of the Honorable Supreme Court of India. It is a national issue. So a legal solatium is needed for the whole Indian Students. It is planned to frame a steady Cyber System also for this unjustifiable and inhumane act of a responsible Commission which stands for higher education well being.